The Podcast’s the Thing

Here I am, trying to get back on the reflective blogging again!  In my class’ most recent publishing cycle, a handful of my students chose to blog their pieces–something we’ve done with great success in the past.  Another handful chose to podcast.  Though I’ve fallen down on the job of promoting their work, I plan to add this to the publishing choices on a permanent basis. 

My initial concern was time, and so I was relieved that a minority of the class chose podcasting.  The funny thing was, it was very quick.  This group has a lot of techno-confidence at this point, and I spent about a minute explaining the program I use to capture and edit audio (an open source miracle called Audacity), and walked away.  Each podcaster handled the rest quite well, although I did do some editing of the audio after school.  Most of the students heard their first recording and then chose to do a second, wanting to improve on their phrasing, expression, etc.  Nice when they attend to fluency, isn’t it?  I could easily have podcast the entire class in just a few days worth of readers’ workshops using just my desktop and a single microphone.  So this excuse not to podcast has been blown out of the water.

Now I have to do my part.  Like the blog, it is clear that I need to be a major promoter of the podcasts, which have a home at Podcast People.  It has a free basic service that is more than adequate for our podcasting needs and is reasonably efficient.  My plan is to send the link out in the class newsletter, and then email the link with a request for commentary to all of my building colleagues and all of the literacy coaches in my district.  I may even hang our shingle out on the Red Cedar Writing Project listserv (all the prior-mentioned folks are now properly warned).  This is mostly a shameless promotion of my students’ work, because I’ve seen some really useful reflection on their parts when they read comments.  I’ve also seen a boost in their confidence as writers, which is solid gold in the teaching/learning biz.

So this past publishing cycle, students could podcast, blog, present in Author’s Chair time, or simply post their pieces in the classroom for others to read.  Our last published pieces were required to be blogged and presented in Author’s Chair.  Given the choice, a full half of the class still chose Author’s Chair, which I’ve been mulling over for a couple of weeks now.  This is the classic and familiar choice, and probably the only one they had prior to joining my class.  So why do the same old thing, I keep wondering.  I know why a few folks choose to simply post in the classroom–this is the single choice they can make that does not open them up to the review of others–podcasts and blogs allow commentary, and Author’s Chair in my room is followed by two “stars” and two “wishes” from the audience.

Author’s Chair–is it the personal performance element?  Or just the more personal touch?  Is it the familiarity, maybe that gives this option more legitimacy…I’d be curious for anyone who is spending their valuable time reading this crazy business to chime in.  Yes, I know I could just ask the students, but where’s the fun in that?  So, gentle reader, why are my students not flocking to the tech publishing, in all its sparkly innovationyness?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: